Jul 25 2009

Federal funding for abortions?

Category: abortion,Obamaharmonicminer @ 8:22 am

The Abortion Administration. Much more at the link.

In his first week in office, President Obama issued an executive order overturning the Reagan-era Mexico City regulations, which had prohibited American foreign aid from going to organizations that finance overseas abortions. Just a few weeks later, the Gallup organization revealed that the executive order was the single most unpopular action taken by the president during his honeymoon period. At a time when American families had experienced an average 25 percent decline in their net worth, it would appear that increasing the net worth of foreign abortionists was not high on their to-do list.

Their reaction was even less surprising in the light of another recent Gallup finding: For the first time in over 10 years, voters who describe themselves as pro-life have taken the lead (by 51 to 42 percent) over voters who describe themselves as pro-choice. Even this understates antiabortion sentiment, since many people who describe themselves as pro-choice, when probed, favor restrictions on abortion that the present Supreme Court, with its five members who voted for or favor Planned Parenthood v. Casey, would never allow.

Given the breadth of his domestic agenda, the president might want to make a midcourse correction on abortion. Why highlight an issue where the bulk of the American people, including a sizable share of the 52.9 percent of the electorate who voted for him, are either going in the other direction or have severe qualms?

But by now, nearly six months in, the bottom line for Barack Obama is clear. After making a few polite noises about finding “common ground” with pro-lifers, his administration has shown zero interest in doing so. Instead, the Obama agenda is to weave government-backed abortion into the fabric of American life and make it a far more integral part of domestic and foreign policy than ever before.


Why is Obama pushing ahead with such a radical abortion agenda? Since there’s no way to accuse him of doing it out of poll-driven opportunism, sincere conviction becomes the most plausible motive. Sometimes the simplest, most straightforward answer makes the most sense. A president who once said he wouldn’t want his daughter punished with a baby if she made a mistake is deeply committed to making free and easy access to abortion an inescapable element of American culture.

2 Responses to “Federal funding for abortions?”

  1. harmonicminer says:

    On my facebook page, this comment was made:

    “I always find that term, <"pro-abortion,"> so inaccurate – I don’t think anyone is truely ‘pro’ abortion, including Obama. Terms like that serve only to deepen the divide rather than contributing to anything productive.”

    I responded this way:

    “The term “pro-abortion” does not deepen the divide, it merely clarifies the size of it.

    Read here: http://tinyurl.com/d4sept

    Pro-abortion is really the correct term.”

  2. Tom says:

    How about the term pro-infanticide. Actually, I think the “divide” is pretty deep now and a “term” is not going to deepen it much more.

    Obama has a Czar that believes animals should have the right to sue their owners and another that believes in infanticide(legal abortion to the age of two). I think Obama has made his choice quite clear.

Leave a Reply