{"id":846,"date":"2009-05-23T09:13:00","date_gmt":"2009-05-23T16:13:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.harmonicminer.com\/wordpress\/2009\/05\/23\/seeing-with-one-eye-the-left-one\/"},"modified":"2009-05-21T21:22:41","modified_gmt":"2009-05-22T04:22:41","slug":"seeing-with-one-eye-the-left-one","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.harmonicminer.com\/wordpress\/2009\/05\/23\/seeing-with-one-eye-the-left-one\/","title":{"rendered":"Seeing with one eye — the LEFT one"},"content":{"rendered":"

Cheney’s speech contained omissions, misstatements<\/a><\/p>\n

And Obama’s didn’t? This is just the very model of selective reporting.<\/p>\n

In any case, when was the last time you saw ANY report in the major media that simply went down a list of Obama’s statements in a speech, and then quoted someone else contradicting each one with contrary information and perspectives, without then giving Obama’s side a chance to rebut THOSE positions?  What, you say you can’t remember that EVER happening?<\/p>\n

I can’t either.<\/p>\n

The media could start with fair reporting on what he’s doing to the economy, and plans to do to health care.<\/p>\n

But that would be in some alternate universe where the major media wasn’t made up of Obama groupies.<\/p>\n

In any case, note that most of the “contradictory evidence” reported by the article comes from people now in Obama’s pay or sphere of influence.<\/p>\n

Share this:<\/h3>