{"id":37,"date":"2008-06-10T20:48:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-11T03:48:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.harmonicminer.com\/wordpress\/?p=37"},"modified":"2010-10-11T20:50:02","modified_gmt":"2010-10-12T03:50:02","slug":"the-left-at-christian-univs-part-3-diversity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.harmonicminer.com\/wordpress\/2008\/06\/10\/the-left-at-christian-univs-part-3-diversity\/","title":{"rendered":"The Left at Christian Univs, part 3: Diversity"},"content":{"rendered":"
If you care to understand the development of diversity<\/span> as an ideological, political enterprise in higher education, you need to read this book. <\/a>\"\"<\/a><\/div>\n

Diversity: The Invention of a Concept<\/span><\/a>, by Peter W. Wood, was published in 2003, in the same time frame as the Supreme Court’s ruling in Gratz<\/em> v. Bollinger<\/em>, preceding by just a bit the ruling that outlawed University of Michigan’s undergraduate racial quotas for failing to meet the test of being “narrowly tailored.”<\/p>\n

It is essential reading for anyone, right or left, who wants to understand the development of the diversity initiatives that are so popular in colleges and universities, as well as certain non-profits, government agencies and even some businesses, especially large corporations. It is very scholarly, dense with references (they don’t get in the way of the narrative, but they provide sources for further study, or confirmation for doubters), historically grounded, yet highly readable and accessible to general readers. The author is a professor of anthropology, and former Associate Provost of Boston University. He’s seen academia from the classroom and the administration building.<\/p>\n

Better reviews than I would be likely to write can be found here<\/a> and here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Why it matters<\/span><\/p>\n

As I discussed in The Left at Christian Universities, part 2<\/a>, a trend for Christian universities and colleges seems to be to move left by adopting essentially secular enterprises. Diversity<\/span>, as understood for the last 30 years or so, is one of these, regardless of how we adorn it. In an upcoming post, I’ll very briefly review some that history. However, for the full story, from 19th century antecedents to 1970s court cases to 1990s academic dogma, this book is a goldmine.<\/p>\n

UPDATE: Part 4 in this series here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Share this:<\/h3>