{"id":216,"date":"2008-09-11T09:02:14","date_gmt":"2008-09-11T16:02:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.harmonicminer.com\/wordpress\/?p=216"},"modified":"2008-09-09T11:04:48","modified_gmt":"2008-09-09T18:04:48","slug":"libertarians-vs-conservatives-on-the-role-of-the-presidency","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.harmonicminer.com\/wordpress\/2008\/09\/11\/libertarians-vs-conservatives-on-the-role-of-the-presidency\/","title":{"rendered":"Libertarians vs. conservatives on the role of the presidency"},"content":{"rendered":"

I love it when the libertarians and conservatives square off and start punching<\/a>. It’s always instructive, and is a good tonic for those who believe “the right” is monolithic.<\/p>\n

Claremont Institute fellow Michael M. Uhlmann has a dismissive review of The Cult of the Presidency in the current issue of National Review: “It’s Not Just the Executive,” September 15, 2008. (Here it is if you get NR Digital, otherwise it’s available in the print edition). It seems to me that the review largely consists of inaccurate characterizations, unsupported assertions, and non sequiturs. But hey, I’m the author, and understandably biased, so check it out and judge for yourself.<\/p>\n

Uhlmann writes that “The bulk of Healy’s book is devoted to various sins, offenses and negligences of the Bush administration.” That’s a bizarre statement, given that the book has nine chapters and an introduction, and only three of those chapters cover GWB’s tenure. In fact, the “bulk of the book” is devoted to demonstrating that, as I write in Chapter Two, “the problems of the modern presidency did not begin when George W. Bush emerged victorious from 2000’s seemingly interminable Battle of the Chads” and that\u00e2\u20ac\u201cdespite what some on the Left seem to believe\u00e2\u20ac\u201cthose problems will not vanish in January 2009 when he heads back to the ranch to cut brush.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Read it all<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Share this:<\/h3>