{"id":1804,"date":"2010-02-17T09:29:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-17T16:29:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.harmonicminer.com\/wordpress\/2010\/02\/18\/tackling-the-superbowl-ad-controversy\/"},"modified":"2010-02-17T20:02:40","modified_gmt":"2010-02-18T03:02:40","slug":"tackling-the-superbowl-ad-controversy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.harmonicminer.com\/wordpress\/2010\/02\/17\/tackling-the-superbowl-ad-controversy\/","title":{"rendered":"Tackling the SuperBowl ad controversy – UPDATE!"},"content":{"rendered":"

UPDATE!\u00a0 See the rebuttal ad at the bottom of the original post.<\/p>\n

************************<\/p>\n

The discussion before the ad was run:<\/p>\n

<\/object><\/div>\n

And, in case you missed it, the ad:<\/p>\n

<\/object><\/div>\n

You decide.<\/p>\n

But it seems clear to me that “pro-choice” still doesn’t mean much more than “pro-abortion<\/a>.”<\/p>\n

NOW thinks that CBS shouldn’t have run the ad because “it might make a woman who had an abortion feel bad”.<\/p>\n

******************<\/p>\n

UPDATE!\u00a0 It would seem that NOW has<\/em> made a rebuttal ad to the Focus on the Family ad.\u00a0 Here it is:
\n<\/object><\/p>\n

Many thanks to commenter Bob for directing my attention to this.<\/p>\n

Share this:<\/h3>