{"id":1231,"date":"2009-10-22T08:31:00","date_gmt":"2009-10-22T15:31:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.harmonicminer.com\/wordpress\/2009\/10\/22\/shutting-your-mouth-in-britain\/"},"modified":"2009-10-22T08:31:00","modified_gmt":"2009-10-22T15:31:00","slug":"shutting-your-mouth-in-britain","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.harmonicminer.com\/wordpress\/2009\/10\/22\/shutting-your-mouth-in-britain\/","title":{"rendered":"Shutting your mouth in Britain"},"content":{"rendered":"

Press freedom and the internet<\/a><\/p>\n

THIS week a national newspaper ran a fascinating story about absolutely nothing. The Guardian reported on its front page on October 13th that a question had been tabled by an MP in Parliament, but that the newspaper could not reveal “who has asked the question, what the question is, which minister might answer it, or where the question is to be found”. The reason, it explained no less cryptically, was that “legal obstacles, which cannot be identified, involve proceedings, which cannot be mentioned, on behalf of a client who must remain secret”.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

In other words, you can’t talk about what you can’t talk about, and if you even mention that you are not going to discuss the existence of something you aren’t supposed to talk about, you’re in big trouble, buddy.<\/p>\n

These guys would be right at home in the modern university.<\/p>\n

Share this:<\/h3>