Comments on: You might be “group-thinking” if….

By: Mr. Music Lover

Mr. Music Lover — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 02:30:26 +0000

That made it perfectly clear.

By: Mrs. Miner

Mrs. Miner — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:29:48 +0000

In my comment above, “noeconservative” should, of course, read “neoconservative.” In all things, I strive for clarity.

By: K dippre

K dippre — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:10:10 +0000

You must have a degree in dentistry (that I didn’t know about), because this touches off all kinds of raw nerves! I could write several books about this and my experiences with accreditation, but to make an extremely long story short, just ‘abstain’ the next time your committee, sub-committee, ad-hoc committee wishes to take a vote!!

By: Mrs. Miner

Mrs. Miner — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 22:14:50 +0000

As long as one remembers that PRE-EVOLUTIONARY SOCIALLY-CONSTRUCTED GENDER NORMS SYNERGISTICALLY REUPHOLSTERING NOECONSERVATIVE SYSTEMS ALIENATE POSTCOLONIALIST GOD-HONORING MULTIVOCALITIES, falling prey to groupthink need not be feared.

By: Mr. Music Lover

Mr. Music Lover — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:24:40 +0000

But professor, I find group-thinking to be so much easier and less tiresome. A good set of “talking points” and “buzz-words” means I don’t have to think at all. In fact maybe I’ll get so good at the ole’ group-think that I can reach high office in the world of politics. Nah, I’ve never been a very good sheep.